As the political landscape in Sweden braces for elections later this year, Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson (M) has proposed revisiting the issue of adopting the euro as Sweden’s official currency. This proposal comes after a long-standing public rejection of the euro, following a referendum in 2003 where a decisive majority of Swedes voted against joining the Eurozone. Svantesson, however, believes that evolving global and regional dynamics—especially concerning security—warrant a fresh look at the potential benefits and challenges of euro adoption for Sweden.
A Changing World: Why Now?
A lot has changed since Sweden’s referendum rejection of the euro. The most evident shift, Svantesson argues, is the current geopolitical and security climate. In a recent parliamentary debate, Svantesson pointed to significant developments such as the rise of authoritarian leaders globally, particularly Russian President Vladimir Putin and former U.S. President Donald Trump, which have reshaped international relations. She also highlighted the financial crises that have tested the eurozone, most notably the 2008 global financial crash, which raised questions about the stability of the euro itself.
“Given the changes in the geopolitical and economic landscape, it’s time to reevaluate the euro from a fresh perspective,” Svantesson said during the debate. “The risks and opportunities we face today differ from those we faced in 2003. I believe it’s crucial that we assess these factors in light of our current security challenges, not just economic ones.”
Sweden’s growing security concerns—linked to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Nordic region’s increased militarisation—are an essential part of the discussion. Svantesson envisions a comprehensive analysis that goes beyond economic considerations and incorporates the broader strategic context. She is advocating for an in-depth study on the benefits and potential drawbacks of euro adoption, considering the changing nature of security policy in Europe and Sweden’s strategic position within the EU.
An Uncertain Path Ahead
While Svantesson and her party, the Moderates, support euro adoption, the path forward is far from straightforward. In fact, the Swedish political landscape remains deeply divided on this issue. The Liberal Party and the Centre Party also support investigating the euro’s potential benefits, with the latter even formalizing the call for an inquiry at their party conference last year. The Christian Democrats have similarly expressed their backing for further exploration.
However, a substantial opposition exists, particularly from the Sweden Democrats, the Left Party, and the Green Party, all of which are opposed to joining the Eurozone. Furthermore, despite the Moderates’ stance, there is little indication that the Social Democrats—Sweden’s largest political party—are willing to pursue this matter aggressively in the near future.
One critical element of Svantesson’s approach is ensuring that the Swedish people have a voice in the matter. Although she acknowledges that the public sentiment remains largely sceptical, with only 32% of Swedes supporting the euro in a 2025 survey by Statistics Sweden, she remains committed to exploring the issue through a transparent, democratic process.
“The people’s will is paramount,” Svantesson remarked. “While I believe that many of the concerns raised in 2003 are still relevant—such as questions of identity and national sovereignty—today’s geopolitical realities require that we take another look at the pros and cons of the euro.”
The Role of Security in Economic Integration
Security concerns are increasingly being woven into the conversation about economic integration in Europe. Sweden’s previous stance on the euro was heavily influenced by its strong sense of national identity, cultural ties to the krona, and a desire for financial independence. However, as Sweden deepens its security cooperation with NATO and grapples with a more unpredictable security environment in Europe, the argument for closer economic and political integration within the EU is gaining traction.
Sweden’s partnership with the EU has never been more significant, particularly as the European Union seeks to navigate challenges like Brexit, Russia’s aggressive foreign policy, and potential crises in the Eurozone’s southern economies. For some policymakers, adopting the euro could be seen as a strategic move, aligning Sweden more closely with its EU neighbours and enhancing its ability to influence EU decisions related to security and economic policy.
The Current State of the Eurozone
As of January 2026, Bulgaria became the latest country to adopt the euro, marking an important milestone for the EU as it continues to expand the single currency’s reach. In total, 20 of the 27 EU member states now use the euro. This includes Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ireland, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal, and others. Notably, Sweden, along with Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Romania, continues to opt out.
Despite this, the eurozone remains a diverse and occasionally unstable region. Some countries—particularly in Southern and Eastern Europe—continue to face significant economic challenges, including high levels of debt, low growth, and fragile banking systems. These issues raise ongoing questions about the long-term sustainability of the single currency and its capacity to withstand future shocks.
A Need for Comprehensive Analysis
Svantesson’s call for a renewed investigation into the euro is not just about whether or not to adopt the currency but also about assessing the broader implications for Sweden’s economic and political future. The investigation would explore whether euro adoption could enhance Sweden’s standing within the EU, reduce exchange rate volatility, and integrate Sweden more deeply into European economic governance.
At the same time, it would need to address the considerable risks of losing control over national monetary policy, particularly during economic crises. The eurozone’s inability to implement a coordinated fiscal policy has often left individual member states struggling to deal with economic downturns, as seen in Greece’s debt crisis and Spain’s banking collapse.
Ultimately, Svantesson’s proposal signals a recognition of the importance of a forward-looking approach to Sweden’s economic and geopolitical positioning. The country’s membership in the EU is already a vital element of its future, but whether the euro will play a role in that future remains uncertain.
Looking Ahead
In the coming months, Swedish voters and policymakers will continue to debate the merits of the euro. Svantesson’s proposal for a fresh investigation is a reminder that Sweden’s economic and security concerns are evolving, and the country must remain flexible and open to reassessing its role within Europe.
What’s Next?
As the debate around the euro intensifies, the next article will examine the potential impact of euro adoption on Swedish businesses, the labour market, and the broader economy. We will delve deeper into the consequences for the private sector and what Swedish companies can expect from either a continued reliance on the krona or a move to the euro. For readers looking for more insights into this shifting economic landscape, we encourage you to stay connected and share your thoughts with us.
Stay Connected
We welcome feedback and encourage our readers to stay engaged with us on social media and through direct communications. Your insights and opinions are invaluable as we navigate these important discussions for Sweden’s future.